by Derek Lee

My idea makes use of two marketed gimmicks: Neil Tobin's X-pert.

The labels use on the devices for the spectators initials must be glossy to allow use of the "X-Pert's" properties.

The recorders are taken back from the spectators, then the labels are initialed by the performer. Use "X-Pert" to write the first spectator's initials where she can see them but complain that this marker is almost dried up. You reach for another marker and "finish" writing the initials, actually the second spectator's initials. You know the second spectator's initials because you asked at the beginning but you "forgot" so you ask again. You now write the first spectator's initials on this label.

Because the first spectator saw you write one or two of her initials initially, there is no need to suspect a switch. You proceed by trying to hold the two recorders in the same hand at the same time. Then you realize this is too cumbersome and lay down the first spectator's recorder. Then, just pick them up together in the same hand and just hand them back based on the initials (or name).

The next step involves creating enough time misdirection so that everyone forgets that the recorders were on the table for a moment. Make a big fuss over the two spectators standing far enough apart, warn about damaging cell phones and pacemakers, etc.

Then, you begin your act by convulsing , foaming at the mouth, urinating on yourself, speaking backward Latin or anything else to convince the audience that this is more than a mere trick.

[Editor's Note: The description of the workings of Neil's "X-Pert" was changed at his request to prevent exposure of his still-marketed product -- Shane]