![]() |
![]() |
|
One
Eye, Inward
Counting
Hatched Chickens
I had the greatest pleasure to be talking to one of my friends last week, someone I hadn't seen in quite a while. As is typical with us magic types, we discussed this, that, and the other thing -- upcoming lecturers, the way our shows are going, what's next for us... the usual. Then the subject drifted to the net and our experiences therein. My friend talked about how he joined a mailing list for mentalist but left it in short-order because of all the "magician-bashing" that went on. Laughingly, I told him to join the club: as a bizarrist, I get bashed by magicians all the time. A bit of a chuckle, and we returned to our regularly scheduled chit-chat. Driving home later, though, I kept replaying my conversation with my friend. It was a horribly depressing thing, somewhat akin to listening to way too much classic country music where every singer has lost his wife, truck, farm, and dog. Hey, sometimes depression is good for the soul. It's been my experience there is a definite pecking order -- more of a pecking Moebius strip -- in the world of magic. It's based entirely upon what realm of magic you're in, of course. For example, if you're a magician, you look down on mentalists (too unskilled) and bizarrists (too boring) and clowns (too silly). If you're a bizarrist, you look down on magicians (too corny) and mentalists (too predictable) and clowns (too silly). If you're a mentalist, you look down on magicians (too ridiculous) and bizarrist (too weird) and clowns (too silly). If you're a clown, you look down on everyone because you're getting both the laughs and the bucks, so there. Of course, I left out the ancillary orders (coin workers look down on card workers, kid show magicians look down on gospel magicians, etc; I can honestly attest to a card worker who looks down on other card workers who use blue-backed cards) -- there's just too many to count, let alone delineate with any clarity. And we wonder why the magical folks get no respect from anyone, even Rodney Dangerfield. How in the Hells are we going to get any respect from anyone when we're busy showing each other nothing but disrespect? However, I know that, as human animals, our egoes require us to look down on somebody. Anybody will do, in fact. But I propose we kill several birds with a single stone. If we're going to look down on anyone, feel superior to anyone, then let's make sure we do this right. In light of that proposition, here is my own personal pecking order. It's really simple: we're on top, everybody else is on the bottom (I figure if we keep it simple, we can remember exactly who we're supposed to be snearing at). So... We look down on the following groups equally and without bias, since they are way below us and well should be:
There's some bad news, though, gang, and it's probably all my fault. You see, if you read the above, then you're convinced we sit on top of the pecking order. Nothing could be farther from the truth. Actually, we're in the middle. The people above us don't look down on us, however; they are the ones we need to look up to:
See? Isn't that a whole lot easier than looking down on someone who uses pressure locking key rings instead of magnetic? Or plastic tips over rubber? Now maybe I can use my blue-backed Squeezers without being sneered at.
|
All
content ©2008 The Visions Group. All Rights Reserved. Any duplication
without expressed written permission is strictly prohibited. The views expressed are solely those of the contributors and may not necessarily be those of TVG, its clients, sponsors, or affiliates. |